RNS Logo

rns.recipes

◈ 9ce92808be498e9e05590ff27cbfdfe4

Retichat-android Testing Needed

Started by jrl290 ·

batrat 1d164d8a64118a7a...
#21

Thanks for your reply. That's understandable. I think people usually run the server side on desktop servers though. At least on my GrapheneOS, the Sunup app that receives and distributes the notifications does not consume any more battery than Play Services would.

batrat 1d164d8a64118a7a...
#22

Another topic. I'm not sure changing the display name is needed. Grandma won't understand that could be announced globally and not everybody would want that. I don't think it brings much value but does needlessly sacrifice anonymity.

#23

When I read your forum post it says "batrat" followed by "500e6ab103644d2839781081cb689906"

Would you prefer for me to only see "500e6ab103644d2839781081cb689906"?

batrat 1d164d8a64118a7a...
#24

Sorry for not providing a sensible alternative, which I think would be that the person adding a contact would name that contact on their device.

batrat 1d164d8a64118a7a...
#25

That obviously would be device specific which has its downsides too. Integration of Reticulum identities with a Contacts app would be cool (not the scope of this app of course).

#26

Renaming people is in there already. It's just up to the person how they want to present themselves and how others want to label you in their contacts

But yes, I think it'll be integral to have a way to manage multiple addresses for the same person. Exactly how to go about choosing which one to message will be a very tough puzzle to solve

batrat 1d164d8a64118a7a...
#27

One last thought about announces. Maybe there could be a notice warning that your display name could be globally seen by any Reticulum user? So people at least have an idea about what they are doing when they rename themselves. Announces themselves are not mentioned in the app and newcomers won't realize their presence is globally seen just by opening the app for the first time

#28

I hear what you're saying and you're right. Let me look into it

#29

I'm changing the way Retichat works to put FIELD_SENDER_NAME in direct message metadata instead of in LXMF announces. Non-standard, but too bad. I think you're absolutely right

Anonymous
#30

Quick test report:

I am missing the annouces. Thanks to the ability to see the announces, people can start conversations with strabgers. Also you know the network connection is working fine.

I2P is there but Tor support is missing.

Post a Reply

Supports Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, `code`, ```code blocks```, [links](url)

Log in to upload images

Quote
Copied to clipboard